Septage Pumper Truck On A Semi Sunny Day

Pumper trucks have been rolling continuously through Los Osos as laterals have been installed and septic tanks emptied. Where does all that stuff go? The City of Santa Maria!

Septage Receiving:
The Regulatory Compliance group operates the Septage Receiving Facility at the WWTP, and issues permits to waste haulers. The only facility of its kind on the Central Coast, this facility provides an important service to surrounding communities. The facility accepts deposited waste from portable toilets and residential and commercial septage, and allows haulers to dewater and store grease from restaurants. 

There was a burp in our new sewer's collection system seven months ago after sneaky contractor dumped some of this goop directly into the new sewer pipe - you can read about it here in a story by Neil Farrell in the Bay News:

http://www.tolosapressnews.com/first-hiccups-community-sewer/

I don't know If this is what happens in Santa Maria, but this video of septage delivery and processing is pretty fun—for sewer geeks anyway—the contraption featured is called a "Honey Monster!" The video has only gotten four views, so maybe you dear readers, can boost the viewership. Added bonus, the music is straight out of the 1980s!

Products Made From Reclaimed Toilet Paper

Yes, you read that right. It is an interesting concept as long as heavy rubber gloves are involved. If you recall, the Poo-Pets folks actually use cow flops, aka cow manure to fashion their creations, so why should objects made from used toilet paper (vs. food processed via a bovine alimentary canal) be so unimaginable (just because it was used by a human?). It seems like a lot of cellulose is involved with either. 

Have a look. Just remember, these bowls are decorative and you would not want to be eating your Wheat Chex in them.

http://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/750/154354.html

A Holiday Gift For Someone You Really Don't Like 💩

💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

Have a look:

http://throwboy.com/products/poop

Or maybe this?

https://www.betabrand.com/womens-poo-emoji-casual-pocket-dress.html

Or for the thrifty, maybe just send one of these in a digital holiday card?

http://emojipedia.org/pile-of-poo/

Hey, send a box of homemade holiday cookies - here's how!

November 19, World Toilet Day

My bad. I missed the opportunity to inform you of World Toilet Day this year. I know this is a light hearted blog—well, most of the time—but this is a serious subject. Check out the website:

http://www.worldtoiletday.info

We may whine and complain, but really, we have it so good. One in three people in the world do not have access to a toilet. Here is a quote off the website:

"Worldwide, it is estimated that almost one-fifth of all urbanites – over 700 million people – live without a decent toilet. To put that into context, the queue for people waiting for toilets in our cities and towns would stretch around the world 29 times."

Manhole Cover Holiday Gifts!

Yes, it is almost that time again. Turkey Day is right around the corner and then, 31 days later....it is time for turkey again, or ham, or like in my family, lutfisk, which many feel belongs at the very least in a sewer blog, it is not for the faint of stomach. But I digress.

Take a look at the website below if you would like an unusual gift for a favorite friend, or your best enemy, who perhaps lives in Los Osos and is acquainted with things sewer. 

http://www.vernakular.com/collections/manhole-cover-doormats
(Where else can you find that Kuala Lumpur manhole cover doormat that you have been wanting since that ill-fated trip sixteen years ago?)

http://www.vernakular.com/collections/manhole-cover-coaster
How about manhole cover coasters? Perfect under that tall, frosty glass of your favorite urine-hued brew!

Happy shopping!

Victorian Fashion And The Loo

Perhaps you have wondered how ladies in voluminous Victorian dresses managed to take care of the bodily necessities that result from eating and drinking. We have all seen plenty of movies with food scenes where the gorgeously clad actors daintily fork up some prawns in aspic or sip a thimble of sherry from a cut crystal footed glass. But from personal experience we know that there is more to the story and that is where this video comes in—to explain how these exquisitely clad ladies managed all of "that." If you did not wonder about this, stick around and learn something.

Cambria's Sludge Stench!

P.U., 400 tons of it!

Read about it here in the Trib:

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/community/cambrian/article115146178.html

Some Poop Humor For A Change Of Pace

The Poo-Pourri peeps have the funniest ads!

"We Delay, We Pay" Hit Morro Bay

Sadly, the le$$ons Los Osos had to offer Morro Bay did not resonate:

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article114483123.html

Cal Poly's "Sewer Tour"

Today in the Tribune, photographer David Middlecamp posted a photo from the vault about a long gone Cal Poly tradition for new students called the "Sewer Tour!" It is gross and hilarious! Have a look:

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/photos-from-the-vault/article114325738.html

Julie Tacker And Money

Let the facts speak for themselves. The sewer money FACTS. Read about a current candidate for the LOCSD. You may judge for yourself if you are happy to pay back your tax monies that were used to pay off attorneys to defend bad decisions requiring a legal defense. In any case, it is all over now - for good - if Julie Tacker is NOT re-elected.

(For a larger size, click the image.)

Update On Sewer Redux!

True to form, Julie Tacker removed the posts beneath my article below. 

I posted my comment to her campaign page at 12:38 p.m.. I checked her page a couple of times during the afternoon and two posts (NOT supporting her) were added to mine. I looked at my E-mails at 4:21 p.m., and found that I had received an E-mail from Facebook notifying me of a comment to what I wrote at 3:44 p.m. (someone I have never heard of). I went to Facebook to look, but all comments had vanished. Well, it was up for three hours anyway! I hope a few people saw it!

Sewer Politics Redux

Sewer politics has been with this town ever since the idea of a sewer was floated back in the 1970s. Battles were fought for and against. Our sewer is now built thanks to the County, and we are hooking up, but a whiff of sulphur still lingers locally, this time in the candidacy of someone for the Los Osos Community Services District board. This time the political football is not the sewer, but the very existence of the LOCSD. The LOCSD was created to have local control of the sewer; we lost that, but now its existence is challenged, which means having any control over our water supply is now challenged..

An opponent to any sewer at all, later revised to "just not THAT sewer," whose latest bid for destruction is the dissolution of the LOCSD under the ruse of "just letting the people decide" is a bad choice for Los Osos. Giving that person a platform for disseminating her message, beyond the three minute limit at public comment, is toxic. I believe her position on the board before, gave her a platform to lead the community into accepting the illegal Measure B. Her name is Julie Tacker.

More recently, Facebook has been her present tool in the current election. Not only are her opinions going out in pixel-world, but paid ads for her have been appearing on timelines. One crossed mine this afternoon that was paid for at CalCoastNews. It was "liked" by someone I am friends with, so it then appeared in my feed. I was now able to comment on said post and lo-and-behold, it appeared on the "Julie Tacker for Los Osos Community Services District" Facebook page! We shall see how long it lasts there before it is blocked. Ms. Tacker has blocked me from viewing her personal page, but I'm sure she will block me from this one too after this.

My comment:

Thank you Mr. X for "liking" this article so it wound up in my feed. I am banned from posting on CalCoastNews because I have opposing ideas from Ms. Tacker and they don't allow free speech over there, even if politely written. So now I have a chance to say something.

Sorry, but have an entirely different opinion from you on her. She wanted to move the sewer out of town, but did so in such a boneheaded way, poking a stick in the eye of the Water Board, that the LOCSD board she was on LOST the low interest loan, lost the sewer project, plunged the town into bankruptcy - which we have FINALLY climbed out of - and now wants to be back on the board - to dissolve it! Yes, DISSOLVE it. No thanks.

Our sewer is now $29 million more out of town, the only local control we have now over our water basin, the big important thing we have left—is by having a seat on the board that controls the water basin— the Basin Management Committee. Dissolve, and all control goes to the County and the two remaining water purveyors one of which, Golden State, would probably jump on owning it. Bad idea.

Please DO NOT vote for Julie Tacker. I do NOT trust her to have anything but her own interests at heart. Electing her to the Board would give her a powerful platform to push her idea of dissolution, which is a bad idea for this town. She has promoted many ideas to help her developer boyfriend in the past, you have to ask - what is her motive to push away our local control?

Sewer Pipe Fun

I'd like to feature a sewer pipe artist today, Christian and this 3-D model to play with is called "Slime and Sewer!" Enjoy!

Slime and Sewer by Christian on Sketchfab

You can see more of his work here:
https://sketchfab.com/models/79d3426bd4a84ccca687f9f9590cb0e2

Nate's Amazing Tattoo!

Our brave neighbors are doing their own lateral and have the kind of mind that can first 1) Find the clean-out, 2) Know how to cut concrete, 3) Know how to plan projects like this! Anyway, they decided to call in a contractor to bring in equipment to lift up the 4" concrete in the driveway and to dig the trench. To do this alone would be backbreaking - the back being more likely to break than the big concrete  chunks. The little Kubota trencher, or do you call it an excavator? was just the right size for the job. The operator was, much like our beloved sewer crews, rather balletic in operating this thing on a narrow driveway. It must take years of practice to so delicately maneuver a contraption like this. Naturally, I was fascinated to watch yet another step in our sewer work. The trench came out beautifully!

Anyway, he was super friendly and, when not working, didn't mind my asking about his tattoo. I have never seen anything like it and I'll be only a handful of you (and his friends, of course) have either. Take a look (and click on the image to make it bigger):

WOW!! Amazing!!! It is of a skull toilet bowl with crossed wrenches right behind it!! Rather perfect for Los Osos, I'd say!! Anyway, you can ask him about it, there is quite a touching story to this tattoo! His business is called "I am a Plumber Looking for Work." His name is Nate Gunderlock and here is his business card:

For those of you who might want to get some tattoo work done, the artist is Kris at Main Street Tattoo in Templeton.

LOCSD Candidate's Forum 2016 Sewer Reference

Thursday night at the only LOCSD candidate's forum of this election season, a former director is running to be on the board again. While introducing herself, she reiterated her unsubstantiated LOCSD bankruptcy story—that it was not at all her fault. It is unclear as to why she even went to this topic, as maybe five people read this blog where I write about it. This is the only place that I know where this is even being mentioned these days, so is this opinion more widely held than I thought, that she needed to defend her version at the forum? I do post comments on the Tribune though......Have a look at the Nick Wilson article about the forum:
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/election/article109796382.html

Well, anyway, time to move ahead with eyes firmly on the rearview mirror. Julie Tacker appears to want us to follow that unsettling path toward dissolution and we need to watch what she is up to. We have been down this gritty road before, I was there, so I know how hard attempting dissolution can be. We were not successful, despite the many weeks of work and lots and lots of money. Ms. Tacker is sowing the seeds for another attempt however, and it is yet another means of wrenching apart the community just as it was coming together after the 30-year sewer war. She wants dissolution to be on the next ballot. That is just SO WRONG.

Ms. Tacker came on the scene in 2002 and was one of the founders to initiated a campaign to reject the sewer project that we had then, which included filing lawsuits and appeals to state commissions and boards. She managed to get herself elected to the LOCSD in 2004 (she ran in 2002 and didn't win). Below is an image off of the "Concerned Citizens of Los Osos" website. She says she stepped down from being its President when elected. 

What she didn't step down from was the path to bankruptcy. I will post a chart below that shows how the cost for a sewer was upped year after year due to legitimate claims and then obstruction. The chart ends at mid-2005, before the recall election and the illegal Measure B. Note CCLO, Ms. Tacker's cause on the chart.

(Click on the image to increase the size.)

What happened to change public opinion was the slow dripping of anti-sewer opinions, each by itself meaning nothing, but over time, the tiny drips worked up to a concretion of resistance that froze the Mid-Town project in 2005. The bankruptcy soon followed. This dissolution idea has now begun its own drip. Do we sit here and watch it or do we stop it? This forum and the reporting of it is the first time the idea has landed in a very visible place: it only had a mention at a LOCSD meeting, and on Facebook, and that online crackpot rag, CalCoastNews. It has now has the legitimacy of The Tribune.

Ms. Tacker, the hypocrisy of running for a seat on a board that you wish to destroy is pretty amazing. It is getting a seat on that same board you nearly demolished in 2006. I guess if it wasn't killed off the first time, you try again, is that it? I can't help but think you have motives to do this beyond your claim of "saving money." That didn't work so well the last time, did it?

When A Sewer Hook-Up Affects Your Water Bill

$$$$$$$$$$

It was brought to my attention yesterday by a savvy County employee that the sewer service charge is determined by your water bill in January and February. That is when we are supposed to get rain, so outdoor watering would be minimal to nonexistent, all your water use would be from inside the house, hence, it will be going to the sewer plant and subject to a charge to clean it up and pump it. 

So, if you are repurposing your tank and are doing the trenching during those months, you will be filling your tank and adding the bleach to disinfect it. Whether your tank is 800 gallons or 1200 gallons, that is a lot of water, and that will be on your water bill as "indoor use" water, even though it is not. 

When doing their trenching, some have reported that a tanker truck will come with water to fill the tank and then pump it back out again after doing the bleach process. These "tanker truck" customers will not have a water bill that is actually from their water purveyor, so this won't count as "sewer use."

Think about this before scheduling your trenching then. If you can get cheap, outside water that doesn't come from your home's water service, your sewer bill won't reflect the increased water use!

Sludge Next Week On BOS Agenda

No kidding, I'm not talking about the contents of some of the usual public speaker's screeds! This is about sludge land applications!

The Los Osos Habitat Conservation EIR (part of the sewer project) is also on the agenda! I'll put in links to the relevant documents when they become available.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016
CONSENT AGENDA - REVIEW AND APPROVAL

Items: Set for Hearing:

1. Introduction of an amendment to Title 8, Section 8.13.030 of the San Luis ObispoCounty Code, to extend the expiration date from March 31, 2018 to March 31, 2021 forOrdinance 3258: Moratorium on the Land Application of Treated SewageSludge/Biosolids; and find that the project is exempt from Section 21000 et seq. of theCalifornia Public Resources Code (CEQA). Hearing date set for November 8, 2016. AllDistricts. 

Consent Agenda - Planning & Building Items: 

8. Request to approve a contract amendment with Rincon Consultants Inc. in the amount of$67,975 to prepare the Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental ImpactReport/Environmental Impact Statement. District 2. 

Julie's Revisionist History......Again.

I am stepping into the sewer on my sewer blog to correct the misstatements of a certain retread political candidate for the LOCSD. Once again Julie Tacker is making, no, faking history to put herself in a more favorable light. This image is off her campaign Facebook page - click to see a larger image and to read the text:

Misstatement #1 - "...which District 2 County Supervisor wouldn't move the sewer in 2003 when the permits were before them?"

Nooooo. That is NOT what was before them. YOU, Ms. Tacker, were before them—on the topic of the Coastal Development Permit; you were stating that the EIR was faulty. There was no "moving the sewer" mentioned. If "moving it" was the intent, it would take an incredible amount of work to do so, actually YEARS of work, not just a meeting in front of the Board. Never mind the additional cost.

Here is a copy-and-paste right off of the minutes of the October 21, 2003 Board of Supervisor's meeting (and BTW, the EIR was certified on March 1, 2001, so as the objections and lawsuits mounted, we can already see how this was upping the cost of the project: 2001 - $81.6 million; 2003 - $93 million):

This is the time set for hearing to consider an appeal by Julie Tacker for Concerned Citizens of Los Osos and Al Barrow for Citizens for Affordable and Safe Environment of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Los Osos wastewater project, a request by the Los Osos Community Services District to construct and operate a community wastewater project to include a collection system, treatment facility plant, effluent disposal system, harvest well system and all related infrastructure, located in the community of Los Osos; 2nd District. 

Ms. Nancy Orton: Project Manager for the County, presents the staff report; outlines the location of the project; addresses the issues of the appeal; comments on drawings of the proposed sewer site; corrects Conditions #73 and #74, the beginning of the paragraph, to read: “Prior to Approving Sewer Hookups for New Construction.”; recommends adoption of the resolution upholding the Planning Commission’s recommendation and deny both appeals.

Ms. Julie Tacker: Appellant (Concerned Citizens of Los Osos), states she is representing 108 concerned citizens; believes the EIR is not complete for the proposal before the Board; urges the Board to delay or deny this request until this EIR has been completed; gives a video tape presentation of her appeal which outlines her concerns to the Tri-W site; no study being done on the impacts to the downtown businesses; concerns regarding sludge, septage, water, hydrology, drainage, ESHA (Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas), SSMP (Septic System Management Plan), economics, assessment and the conditions of approval.

Chairperson Ryan: speaks to his history with the project and in support of the LOCSD. Matter is fully discussed and thereafter, on motion of Supervisor Bianchi, secondedby Supervisor Pinard and on the following roll call vote: 

AYES: Supervisors Bianchi, Pinard, Achadjian, Chairperson Ryan  

NOES: None

ABSENT: Supervisor Ovitt 

the Board denies both appeals, Conditions #73 and #74 are amended to change the first sentence to read: “Prior to Approving Sewer Hookups for New Construction.” and RESOLUTION NO. 2003-366, resolution affirming the decision of the Planning Commission and conditionally approving the application of Los Osos Community Services District for Development Plan/Coastal Development Permit D020283D, adopted as amended.

EVERY ONE PRESENT VOTED AGAINST YOU! You are picking on Bianchi because she called it like it is: "If I lived in Los Osos, I would vote for almost anyone but Julie Tacker. She was, is, and probably always will be, a political disaster." (I'm sure she is tough enough to take the taunts from a, pardon the expression, lightweight like you.)

Misstatement #2 - "...had Bianchi and that board voted to deny the Tri-W  permits the sewer would have been out of town, contracts wouldn't have been let and a nasty bankruptcy wouldn't have ensued."

Well, let's just pick that one apart! You readers all know by now that Measure B, which stopped the sewer until it was proven in court to be invalid, was won by a slender 19 votes in 2005. What evidence was there to show there were enough votes to pass it in 2003 (not that it had been even DRAFTED then), and how else would the "community will" to move it be demonstrated if not by a vote? Look how many years it took to get to the point of selecting a location with the County's project behind the cemetery? You just assumed some magic wand could provide the location, the EIR, and the permits I guess.

You know Julie, that your board wouldn't even ALLOW a 218 vote in 2005 which would have demonstrated the community's will, you were so afraid that it would not pass, and that the sewer would then continue at Tri-W. It was put to your board by the State Water Board and you refused to do it. Don't claim it was the cost of holding a vote - how do you think there would be ANY money for ANY sewer without a VOTE? A vote this time that would involve property owners ONLY - not a "Measure-B-anyone-can-vote" type of vote?

The contracts had to be let for the project that was going to be built - you know, that one with the $134 million dollar SRF loan tied to it that your board threw away. The Water Board was serious with their threats of fines in 2003. They were serious in 2005 as you finally found out. Remember those CDOs that we can thank YOU for?

(And remember the $20 million bonds sold in 2002 to buy the property, design the project, and to pay for the permits. Those were flipped off by your board too - but not flipped off of our tax bills - they are still right on there every year.)

Setting all of that aside, let's get right on to the bankruptcy. First point, you poked a stick in the eye of the Water Board for not ASKING PERMISSION to stop the project. That was in the contract for the SRF $134 million loan. That lack of understanding ensured that your board would NOT get anymore payments from the state. Then you all went right off budget in October as soon as you were in office by hiring a new attorney, and new general manager ($450,000/year)—while you were paying the old GM and the old attorney to do nothing—AND you paid $75,000 to get rid of the public information officer. But that is small potatoes when you hired another attorney for $1.5 million! 

Where did you think the money would come from to pay for all of that? Well, we know where you found it - you took our tax money that we had paid for our bond payments, forcing the bond reserves to be spent that were to have been the last payment. Naturally, the lender raised a big stink about that, and we are STILL paying that money back! Our fire tax money had been spent too, so the CSD reserves were spent to cover us to keep our fire service.

So where did our $450,000 water reserves go? MIA. That was never paid back.  It was written off by General Manager Kivley in 2015. No wonder you went after her with a vengeance - she knew what your board did!

Anyway, your rewriting of history is always rather amazing to read. Thanks for the opportunity to set the record straight—again.

BOS Tuesday! Sewer Rules And Regs!

Tuesday, October 18, after 1:30 p.m., the BOS will be considering an ordinance to establish all the rules and regulations governing our sewer!

The link to all of the relevant info is here:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=6527

It will be fun to see what the complaints are; as we know, some people just can't help themselves! Some of them might be the same people who want to dissolve the CSD! Yes, how much sense does that make!?? (Well, I suppose if you think about it - it consolidates all of their complaint targets into one place, the County, and that will save them some time!!)