Reference Documents

Showing posts with label BOS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BOS. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

BOS July 7, 2015! Civility on Agenda!

Off the Tuesday, July 7 Supes agenda—

(after the lunch recess and the report out of closed session, which does have the ARB lawsuit and the ISJ as topics for Closed Session. Dollars to doldrums we will hear nothing; we never do. Don't get me started on why the ISJ has dragged on so long, could be the delay in getting a sewer had something to do with that you know.......the recall, losing the $134 million SRF loan, the bankruptcy, etc.....meanwhile our water supply dwindles and dwindles, the county being our only savior with the water conservation measures in its sewer project—the LOCSD tries, but hampered with NO money, gets not very far—poor Golden State stymied by needing to get permission from the PUC to even sneeze, ALL of that.....) 

—OK, back to why I started this.........


Presentations

34. Submittal of a resolution supporting the Civility and Civil Discourse Accord resolution. All Districts. 

I can't wait to see what the support documents say for this item. Maybe the Los Osos CSD needs to check this out for their meetings as there is an echo in the room, albeit a tiny one, from the past uncivil insanity that has recently re-sprouted.

UPDATE: Read the relevant documents off of this link:

http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=4779

Below is a particularly pointed quote from the resolution:


"WHEREAS, we commit ourselves to building a civil political community in which each person is respected and spirited public and political debate is aimed at the betterment of San Luis Obispo County and its people and not the disparagement of those with whom we disagree."

I guess that means shouting down a person at the podium from the back of the room is not to be condoned. Yes, some of the audience members at the LOCSD should take note. What they are doing is not aimed at any betterment of the community, but rather the betterment of their personal status among other like-mouthed louts.

Saturday, March 14, 2015

Monarch Grove Could Hook-Up

The section of Los Osos called Monarch Grove is a subdivision that is not within the urban reserve line of Los Osos. That oversight will be corrected with a General Plan Amendment/Local Coastal Plan Amendment/Estero Area Plan Amendment. The first stop will be a review by LOCAC to discuss any issues or concerns at the local level. Next, it will go to the Board of Supervisors to authorize the County Planning and Building Department to work on this plan amendment. Then the BOS will need to adopt the amendment. 

It is very strange that this sub-division was never included in the Urban Reserve Line!

Why is this important? To back up a bit, Monarch Grove has its own sewage system, and sadly, one that has been plagued with problems over the years. Read about some of that here:

Monarch Grove 2005 - item3_attachment8.pdf


And read the Staff Report for the Enforcement Hearing for October 6, 2005 here:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/board_info/agendas/2005/oct6/item3/item3_staff_report.pdf


The treated wastewater from the Monarch Grove housing subdivision's system is currently used to water the nearby golf course, Sea Pines. The Los Osos wastewater treatment plant's Coastal Commission Conditions mandates that water be sent to the golf course as is listed on page 16 (page 19 if you opened it in in Acrobat) of the Effluent Reuse and Disposal Tech Memo, July 2008. However, this is not a problem as it shows that only 16 AFY is going Sea Pines, not enough to water the whole property.

According to the Basin Plan, the golf course currently uses 15-20 acre feet a year from Monarch Grove, still not enough to water the entire property. Water from on-site upper aquifer wells at 75-85 acre feet a year supplements that, totaling 90-105 acre feet a year from both sources to water the golf course.

The Basin Plan has allocated 40 acre feet a year of recycled water for Sea Pines, and the plan is to blend it with their upper aquifer well water 1:1. So the 15-20 AFY from Monarch now is replaced with 40 AFY. So only 50-65 AFY will be used of their upper aquifer well water. As crummy with nitrates as the upper aquifer water is, and despite the fact that 300,000 to 1,000,000 gallons of water leach into the bay DAILY anyway from seeps and springs (.92 AFD - 3.69 AFD), this is a net gain for the basin. 

Once the septics go off line, the water table is bound to lower. That will be a problem for the wastewater team to monitor as part of the conditions of the Coastal Development Permit, Condition #87.

Here is the pre-authorization referral request that is to go before LOCAC, I am not sure when, the March agenda is not out yet.

LRP2014-00021_COUNTY_OF_SLO__MONARCH_GROVE_.pdf


For map geeks, here are links to the County ones from 1997. Monarch Grove sat this point is apparently a remainder parcel of Tract 1589, to be carved up into lots:
https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/MB/MB_018/MB_018_032_001.tif
https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/MB/MB_018/MB_018_032_002.tif
https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/MB/MB_018/MB_018_032_003.tif
https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/MB/MB_018/MB_018_032_004.tif
https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/MB/MB_018/MB_018_032_005.tif

This moving Monarch Grove into the Urban Reserve Line was on the BOS agenda (among other things) October 5, 2004, Item 11 (after lunch). 
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Asset7098.aspx
This item was continued to October 19, 2004. On October 19, the BOS tentatively agreed to include Monarch Grove into the Estero Area Plan Update (see the last page):
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/CR/BOS+Minutes/BOS_2004/101904.pdf
But then.......less than a year later.........the sewer project was stopped, Los Osos was left out of the update and here is where we are today.

Monarch Grove does not appear to have an assessment for hooking up (see page 3):
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PW/LOWWP/document+library/Final+Assessment+Roll+-+April+08.pdf

But the Solano Pump Station seems poised to take in Monarch Grove flows (see Page 21):
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PW/LOWWP/document+library/20111024+Final+BODR.pdf

It is a mystery. Much searching found no answer as to why the second half of the subdivision was left out of the Urban Reserve Line, just speculation.



Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Los Osos Items - BOS Tuesday, November 25

These items were posted today, Tuesday, November 18:


AGENDA                                BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Consent Agenda - Public Works Items:
  1. 23. Submittal of a resolution authorizing execution of notice of completion and acceptance of construction for the 2013–14 Asphalt Overlay, South Bay Boulevard from Los Osos Valley Road to Santa Ysabel Avenue in Los Osos. District 2. 
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=4023
  • Hearings: 
  • 42. Hearing to consider an amendment to the Building and Construction Ordinance, Title 19 of the County Code, changing the requirements for retrofitting of plumbing fixtures in connection with additions, remodels, and new development of residential, commercial and other structures within the Los Osos Groundwater Basin. District 2. 
  • 43. Hearing for an amendment to the Health and Sanitation Ordinance, Title 8 of the County Code, changing the requirements for sellers of real property within the Los Osos Groundwater Basin to retrofit plumbing fixtures with water-efficient fixtures at time of sale. District 2.

When the links to the support documents become available, I will post them.
Note: see links above, posted November 19, 2014.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Board of Supes February 4!

Off the Consent Agenda for February 4, 2014:
  1. Submittal of a resolution authorizing execution of notice of completion and acceptance for the Los Osos Valley Road widening between Doris Avenue and Pine Avenue in Los Osos. District 2.

    I'll add the link to relevant documents when they become available.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Mystery Solved, Disruption Displayed

Yesterday's mystery of the video capture was revealed today on YouTube. It was to be a hit piece against Supervisor Adam Hill. Instead it actually revealed what the official Board of Supervisor's videos don't capture: the obnoxious and disruptive behavior of the weekly sewer complainers from Los Osos. Really, If anyone had any doubt, please play the video below and hear this for yourself. Thanks to Ms. Mordaunt and/or "Slohealth nut" who posted this video, they may be one in the same, I don't know.

The excellent point Mr. Hill makes is that if the accusations against the project were as bad as they were described every week, scores of people would be there to complain, not just the angry, repetitive, boring five. The italics are my words but my feelings are shared by many. That anger does Los Osos no good on any front or in any venue.

Advised, But No Consent


Today at the Board of Supes there was an item on the Consent Agenda regarding the Los Osos Wastewater Project.  It was to approve two contract amendments for more money out of the wastewater budget to extend work on the project. Naturally, the usual Los Osos' public speakers were challenging the entire project once again. The item was postponed to some late date in January for a couple of frustrating reasons:
• Supervisor Mecham hadn't had time to look at the staff report until Sunday as he was busy with the Paso water issues, leaving no time to consult with county staff with his questions. So he was unprepared to vote on anything he hadn't studied. 
• Supervisor Arnold wanted a presentation to hear more. She didn't like that this was placed on the Consent Agenda.
Mecham responded to an angry Supervisor Hill saying that he wasn't pandering to the L.O. people who blurt out from the back of the room (who had been among those pushing for a postponement). Chairperson Gibson then had to tell the back of the room to be quiet and stop interrupting or they would be asked to leave the chambers; they'd had their time to speak uninterrupted. (I wonder how sick and tired he is of having to keep doing this? I'm fed up with those speakers' displays of rudeness and entitlement in their boorish behavior.)

Hill was angry because of the 30 years of sewer obstruction, people had found ways to sabotage projects. Clearly this delay was feeding the angry speakers red meat. That is my opinion anyway, and I was temporarily really mad at them "winning." But then, this is merely a battle, not the war. This WILL pass in January.

(Oh, what will they have to complain and bash the County over once we are wastewater compliant?  Fast food? Bus routes? I know, solid waste rates!  What kind of lives do these people have that all they can come before the Board with is anger and complaints? I'd hate to be any one of them. Really, is it a good psychological strategy to just swing with a sledgehammer every week? How well does that work in their own lives when they are on the other end? But then, this all really is just punishment to the County for voting to take a project they didn't like or want—and certainly did not want to pay for. Watchdogging is only a guise. What logic do you operate with when your own obstructionism caused massive price increases in the project? In 2001 the estimated cost for a wastewater treatment plant was $84.6 million; in 2005 it was $154 million; now it is $173 million (if you don't count the part of the approximately $20 million bond where the environmental work and permits for the last project were paid from. But I digress.)

Supervisor Ray tried to make peace and suggested that a delay in voting would be OK if time time was not of the essence.

John Waddell, Project Manager said that it was desirable to have approval this year for budgeting and planing but that there was money still left to pay contractors until the end of January so this could work.

Another frustrating part for delaying this item; upping the money HAD been discussed twice before, on June 18 and October 8. The Corollo contract had been approved and more money was just being disbursed today with a vote. Their overall design and job performance was to be evaluated before releasing these additional funds. On the HDR adjustment, its not their fault that the trenching schedule was pushed out six months (and the pump station work comes after that). This requires them to do the additional project management. Any budget adjustments later won't come out of community money, but from unanticipated revenues from grants anyway. The amounts from the 218 vote and the 2007 estimates remain the same. The strategy Paavo Ogren said, was to award tighter amounts of money to contractors and then adjust upward when more money is required, its not good to put all the money out there at the beginning.

Now for the mysterious part of today's BOS meeting! Why was Agenda 21-er Laura Mordaunt taking a video of John Waddell and Paavo Ogren with her phone? She lives in San Luis Obispo, not Los Osos. Her red phone case matched her red sweater perfectly though!



The far odder part was non-Los Osos resident Mike Brown from COLAB bashing the County on this Los Osos item. He fronts a group whose board and members remain anonymous! Kinda creepy!