Reference Documents

Showing posts with label Los Osos CSD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Los Osos CSD. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

BOS July 7, 2015! Civility on Agenda!

Off the Tuesday, July 7 Supes agenda—

(after the lunch recess and the report out of closed session, which does have the ARB lawsuit and the ISJ as topics for Closed Session. Dollars to doldrums we will hear nothing; we never do. Don't get me started on why the ISJ has dragged on so long, could be the delay in getting a sewer had something to do with that you know.......the recall, losing the $134 million SRF loan, the bankruptcy, etc.....meanwhile our water supply dwindles and dwindles, the county being our only savior with the water conservation measures in its sewer project—the LOCSD tries, but hampered with NO money, gets not very far—poor Golden State stymied by needing to get permission from the PUC to even sneeze, ALL of that.....) 

—OK, back to why I started this.........


Presentations

34. Submittal of a resolution supporting the Civility and Civil Discourse Accord resolution. All Districts. 

I can't wait to see what the support documents say for this item. Maybe the Los Osos CSD needs to check this out for their meetings as there is an echo in the room, albeit a tiny one, from the past uncivil insanity that has recently re-sprouted.

UPDATE: Read the relevant documents off of this link:

http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=4779

Below is a particularly pointed quote from the resolution:


"WHEREAS, we commit ourselves to building a civil political community in which each person is respected and spirited public and political debate is aimed at the betterment of San Luis Obispo County and its people and not the disparagement of those with whom we disagree."

I guess that means shouting down a person at the podium from the back of the room is not to be condoned. Yes, some of the audience members at the LOCSD should take note. What they are doing is not aimed at any betterment of the community, but rather the betterment of their personal status among other like-mouthed louts.

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Twisted Sister

A long time ago I worked at a place that put people into business for themselves. You'd buy a membership and then got access to a bunch of business plans and a ton of products to sell at below wholesale costs.

Said "Sister" of the heavy metal band in the title above, ran the Coaching and Sales Department for the company where I worked, but in another state. I guess the band thing didn't work out (there were a lot of ex's from that group for some reason).

I know you are thinking, why do I bring up this non-sewer story, THIS is a sewer blog! Well, there is a strange parallel going on in this county right now of a former "band" member going on to another job, only strangely looking just like how they did on the original stage, doing the same stuff but with a twist. And it is very, very sewer related. Please be patient, the twist will unfold.

I guess I should add that this ex-band member of Twisted Sister still looked the heavy metal dude when he'd bop over to California to check in with the mothership where I worked. He still looked like the guy on stage, just older and doing a slightly different job. When you are on stage, you are promoting yourself, in his case it was heavy metal music, and concert and CD sales for Twisted Sister. In Coaching and Sales, he was brandishing his heavy metal chops to rev up the troops to sell, sell, sell, both the business that we all worked for, and of course, more products.

In this parallel and far more gripping sewer story is an ex-Director of the LOCSD, and the spate of her performances in other towns to rev up the troops to sell, sell, sell you on HER ideas of "the facts." Another "twisted sister" as it were, and the facts are screwy. 

You might know to whom I refer. She's be hard to miss as visible at meetings around the County as she is, etc.. She is also a regular contributor at a SLO County online "news" venue.

The latest "twist" she promotes is the alleged removal of records from the offices of the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). And she wants an audit of the Sanitation District's reserves, they have gone missing! Could there have been wrong doing, she asks?! She is upset that District files were kept at a contractor's office, they are property of the District and should have been stored there! Engineers and staff charged $42 to $108 an hour for basically filing! The invoices totaled $15,000!

Unbelievable, especially if you know what happened when she was a director at the LOCSD during its "sewer days." How can these amounts from another District, not her own, matter so much when money evaporated from the LOCSD on her watch? If she lived elsewhere and was looking in at Los Osos would she have noticed it then? Twisty!

Let's start with the idea that $15,000 is an outrageous amount of money. According to the Sun Bulletin in an article dated  I-18-06 by Abraham Hyatt titled, OSOS CSD BILLS PILE UP, WITH MORE TO COME: 
The most expensive invoice came from the law firm Van Blarcom, Leibold, McClendon, and Mann.  
It shows the district owes more than $57,000 for work mostly done by John McClendon, the district's interim legal counsel, from Sept. 30 through Oct. 31. 
Another law firm, Burke, Williams, and Sorensen -- which the district hired Nov. 23 -- charged more than $22,000 for one week's worth of work at the end of that month. 
The district's own financial records show that a third law firm, Shipsey and Seitz, which the district had used before the election, had been paid nearly $37,000 between November and December as well. 
District interim general manager Dan Bleskey and his company Willdan have also submitted a bill for about $58,000 worth of work for an unknown period of time. 
The district's general manager, Bruce Buel, is on paid administrative leave and continues to collect a $94,000-a-year paycheck.
Below is an excerpt from the Tribune published 3-10-06 from an article by Abraham Hyatt titled, LOS OSOS EXPECTS TO SPEND MOST OF STATE LOAN:
For instance, Bleskey testified that the district's three legal firms have billed $110,000, $97,000, and $50,000 respectively for a recent one-month period. It's unclear what month the bills encompassed, or which firms filed which amounts.

Read more here: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=1104AC754F7DCA30&p_docnum=4&s_orderid=NB0114121709421801597&s_dlid=DL0114121709435002785&s_ecproduct=DOC&s_ecprodtype=NORENEW&s_trackval=&s_siteloc=SO&s_referrer=&s_username=sewercrazed&s_accountid=AC0109090823263613430&s_upgradeable=no#storylink=cpy
And on the topic of missing reserves, well, the bankruptcy of the LOCSD proved that there was noting left, but here is a jpg of page 10 out of the 2005-2006 audit (click for larger image). Look at the expenditures vs. the revenues:



Where was her concern when the monies she and her board had control over vanished? Were these numbers just too large to contemplate, so they didn't register?

As for boxes disappearing, boxes of LOCSD documents disappeared into the trunks of cars on or about October 4, 2005 according to eye witnesses (landing in Gail Mc Pherson's living room it was later revealed). How's that for keeping watch over your own District's files?

Because you have done the things that you accuse others of doing, do you feel that lends credibility to your claims? If so, that is really, really twisted.

Sunday, June 01, 2014

IGM Will Get Up to $291,000 a Year

Ahhh, now for an interesting bit of sewer history!

Much has been made of Paavo Ogren's salary as the new General Manager of Oceano. But in searching around the internet, I found an overlooked bit of history about our own Los Osos CSD from 2005. Apparently one of those yelling the loudest about the Oceano General Manager's salary was a supporter of a Los Osos INTERIM General Manager making a TON more money than Mr. Ogren!

The facts on this mountain of money for an IGM for Los Osos were published in The Sun Bulletin (a Tribune subsidiary back then) on October 19, 2005. I had to go into the archives and pay $2.95 at NewsLibrary.com, the service provider for the SLO Tribune Archives, so I can't point to a link to the article directly, but you can access it yourself if you want to pay, google this title in the Trib's archives (there is more than one article too):

October 19, 2005
INTERIM LOS OSOS MANAGER WILL GET $140 AN HOUR
PRIVATE ENGINEER HIRED BY NEW SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD COULD COST $14,500 TO $24,000 A MONTH
AGENCY ALSO HIRES NEW INTERIM SPOKESWOMAN
Author: The Sun Bulletin (I will add the writer named at the bottom of the story, Nathan Welton.)

The gist of the article says that Dan Bleskey will replace Bruce Buel as GM. Buel earned $94,000 year plus benefits. LOCSD President Lisa Schicker reported that Bleskey would work 3-5 days a week. He will cost the District between $14,500 to $24,000 a MONTH!

So, for a former LOCSD Director to raise a stink about a salary to a permanent General Manager (who by the way will be working two jobs under that title) in another town in which she does not live, seems hypocritical at the very least, but to those who follow sewer politics, it seems like an angry punishment toward a person who, as Public Works Director, offered so much expertise, support and hard work toward getting Los Osos a much delayed sewer, which this same CSD Director didn't seem entirely sold on our town even needing.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Regional Board's Response to LOCSD Letter

I heard about this letter Wednesday and here it is—the response from the Regional Board to the LOCSD's letter on de-watering. Looks like they are fine with what the contractors are doing and if they are not concerned, so neither should we be. To the hair-on-fire commenters on other online places, the fire is officially out.



Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Staff Report - Nitrate Testing - Conclusions!

Check out this staff report for the LOCSD meeting on Thursday, July 19. Nitrate testing in a nutshell. The County will do it. The costs to the LOCSD by either Cleath-Harris or LOCSD crew are now outlined in detail.

http://www.losososcsd.org/Library/2012%20Agenda%20Packet/120719/AgendaItem5E_RequestDistrictConductNitrateTesting.pdf

Monday, May 14, 2012

Monterey Mechanical Appeals Los Osos Bankruptcy

The LOCSD's bankruptcy case isn't over yet. Monterey Mechanical has at the last minute appealed the judgement of the Federal Bankruptcy Court to the 9th District Court of Appeals, where to pull any information out of them down in Ventura, you need to bring your own portable copier to do it at the desk, or hire a service that does this for you.

We have a long wait. The briefing schedule will be determined in November or December and the hearing schedule determined in 2013.
"Did the Bankruptcy Court err in—" is repeated the seven times with the same questions as before (my paraphrasing, You can read the document in full here):
1. —overruling Monterey Mechanical's objection to the assertion that there was a fraudulent transfer of District assets to SLO County in violation of the bankruptcy code?

2. —accepting the CSD's appraisal of a property that might be more valuable to the creditor than stated (the mid-town or Tri-W property)?

3. —relying on Bruce Buel's testimony that the proceeds from the sale of District property would not be available to creditors?

4. —rejecting Monterey Mechanical's assertion of unfairness in the manner of repaying creditor's?

5. —rejecting Monterey Mechanical's statement that the bankruptcy plan was not proposed by the CSD in good faith because the Prohibition Zone is getting the benefit of property value enhancement and protection while paying nothing towards the debt, the County is being insulated from liability of the District's debts through confirmation of the plan rather than dissolution of the District which would pay the debt.

6. —confirming a plan that is not in the best interests of the creditors as the creditors would get 100 cents on the dollar through state law remedies if the bankruptcy plan was rejected.

7 —failing to decide many pivotal questions of state law thereby making the basis for its conclusion simply that this plan "was in the best interests of the creditors?"

Apparently this is not the last place they can go to appeal either. The CSD's coffers drain while Monterey Mechanical fiddles.