A bureaucratic foul-up caused a 42-car train with 400 containers of New York poop to ferment in Parrish, Alabama's rail yard for two months. The residents were not happy. You can read about this rail constipation off the link. The New York Times finds the best stories, really, they do!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/19/nyregion/poop-train-alabama.html
Where does OUR sludge go? Last I heard, it was trucked to Engel and Gray in Santa Maria. But what happens if they fill up? A sludge train from our county to the large facility in the Central Valley (yes there was a great deal of controversy in the early 2000s and beyond) could help us out! We sure don't want oil trains in this county, but what about poop trains? (And will we have any choice?)
http://www.synagro.com/offerings/rail-transportation/
Check out their location map!
http://www.synagro.com/locations/
And finally, for more sewage information - a bit of history, a lot of money, wimpy regulations, and LAWSUITS! Read an excellent paper, Regulate This: The Politics and Practice of Poo Farming, by a Harvard Law School student on what we euphemistically call - biosolids!
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/8852199/Christenson06.html?sequence=2
(There is a wealth of resources just in the footnotes!)
Reference Documents
Sunday, April 22, 2018
Friday, April 20, 2018
Museum of London - FATBERG!!!
I was tardy getting all parts to The New York Times read from their April 1 edition. Last night I was cleaning out my office and ran across an article in the New York Times Magazine section called "Fatbergs."
Sewer followers, this is a MUST READ!!!! Below is the link. Don't be put off by the subscription pop-up, just remove it by clicking the "X" in the upper right hand corner. The fatberg in question was broken up by sewage workers in hazmat suits and a section of it was saved and put into a London museum! That London fatberg, reported here in 2017, was the length of 22 double-decker buses and weighed the same as a blue whale! The online image is far superior to the print edition, so do NOT miss this article—and, as with all things New York Times, the writing is superlative!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-fatbergs.html
Enjoy!
Sewer followers, this is a MUST READ!!!! Below is the link. Don't be put off by the subscription pop-up, just remove it by clicking the "X" in the upper right hand corner. The fatberg in question was broken up by sewage workers in hazmat suits and a section of it was saved and put into a London museum! That London fatberg, reported here in 2017, was the length of 22 double-decker buses and weighed the same as a blue whale! The online image is far superior to the print edition, so do NOT miss this article—and, as with all things New York Times, the writing is superlative!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-fatbergs.html
Enjoy!
Saturday, March 24, 2018
District 2 Supervisor Candidate With A Reclamator Past
Someone very interesting to Los Osos sewer history has popped up in our SLO County District 2 Supervisor's race - Patrick Sparks, the attorney for the "Reclamator" guy. Surely you remember crackpot Tom Murphy who tried to convince the citizens of Los Osos that we really didn't need a sewer, they needed a Reclamator in their yard instead? I think ("Wrecklamator" might have been a better name.)
Here is an article about Tom Murphy: https://calcoastnews.com/2008/10/reclamator-inventor-sues-water-resources-establishment/
Check out page 4 of the Regional Water Quality Control Board minutes to find Sparks and Murphy:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb3/board_info/minutes/2008/05_08_mins.pdf
Read more "Wreclamator" and the Fraud Alert put out by the Water Board: https://www.newtimesslo.com/sanluisobispo/fraud-alert-doesnt-deter-reclamator-proponents/Content?oid=2945838
Sparks speaks at the Board of Supervisors (Item 7):
http://slocounty.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=447
See a copy of the Water Board's Fraud Alert and what I wrote in 2017: http://losewersaga.blogspot.com/2017/07/
And last, but (maybe) least, here is the candidate Sparks himself, in an article in the CalCoastTimes: https://calcoasttimes.com/2018/02/03/patrick-sparks-enters-district-2-supervisor-race-macelvanie/
Here is a dangerous and a completely untrue Sparks quote:
(Click to enlarge images. Sadly, note the quotes around the words "Legal Opinion" on page 2!)
Here is an article about Tom Murphy: https://calcoastnews.com/2008/10/reclamator-inventor-sues-water-resources-establishment/
Check out page 4 of the Regional Water Quality Control Board minutes to find Sparks and Murphy:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb3/board_info/minutes/2008/05_08_mins.pdf
Read more "Wreclamator" and the Fraud Alert put out by the Water Board: https://www.newtimesslo.com/sanluisobispo/fraud-alert-doesnt-deter-reclamator-proponents/Content?oid=2945838
Sparks speaks at the Board of Supervisors (Item 7):
Mr. Patrick Sparks: AES Chief Legal Counsel, states
the Reclamator meets the Gold Standard for recycled water... |
http://slocounty.granicus.com/MinutesViewer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=447
See a copy of the Water Board's Fraud Alert and what I wrote in 2017: http://losewersaga.blogspot.com/2017/07/
And last, but (maybe) least, here is the candidate Sparks himself, in an article in the CalCoastTimes: https://calcoasttimes.com/2018/02/03/patrick-sparks-enters-district-2-supervisor-race-macelvanie/
Here is a dangerous and a completely untrue Sparks quote:
“Gibson cost the city of Los Osos in excess of $100 million for a sewer project that could have built a different way for less,” Sparks said. “The same problem is now occurring in Morro Bay.”
First off, we are not a city, and crackpot technology will bomb just as bad in Morro Bay as it did in Los Osos. You people in Morro Bay really have to be careful about voting for someone willing to represent and support the inventor of an impossible faux sewer solution, which only caused the citizens of Los Osos time, confusion, and ultimately, money.
Tuesday, March 06, 2018
San Francisco Sewer Video
Well, I suspect many of us reading this blog will not be around when our present sewer is ready for replacement, but here is a look at what San Francisco is up against:
http://abc7news.com/politics/sfs-aging-sewers-provide-gross-glimpse-into-need-for-repairs/2558293/
Check out the roaches! Reminds me of my hippie days in Venice, California.
http://abc7news.com/politics/sfs-aging-sewers-provide-gross-glimpse-into-need-for-repairs/2558293/
Check out the roaches! Reminds me of my hippie days in Venice, California.
Friday, March 02, 2018
ARB Lawsuit Settlement Followers Take Note
You will recall that there were not enough Supes present at the last Board of Supervisors meeting to be able to vote on $money$ matters, so here we go:
See item #2 under Board Business:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/1045/QWdlbmRh/6/n/91217.doc
And check all of the documents off of this link:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=8476
See item #2 under Board Business:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/1045/QWdlbmRh/6/n/91217.doc
And check all of the documents off of this link:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/Proposal.html?select=8476
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Monarch Grove Hooking Up!
The Monarch Grove housing tract has had its own wastewater treatment plant since being built. All 83 homes are served by a tidy little package plant that of late has become a bit loose around the seams and in need of an expensive facelift, or abandonment—the cheaper and more reasonable way to go—to hook up to the Los Osos sewer.
First Monarch Grove had to be accepted into the Los Osos URL. There is a whole story as to why it wasn't, not to be gone into here, as I am trying to point your attention to a document from the Board of Supes, February 6.
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Forms-Documents/Projects/LOWWP/Monarch-Grove/2-6-2018-Monarch-Grove-Hearing.aspx
Read about the plan and rationale for "capacity charges" for Monarch Grove. The charges named for them will have no impact on what charges the rest of hook-up-ees are paying.
Sewer geeks, aside from Monarch Grovians, might want to attend the April 3 meeting of the BOS!
First Monarch Grove had to be accepted into the Los Osos URL. There is a whole story as to why it wasn't, not to be gone into here, as I am trying to point your attention to a document from the Board of Supes, February 6.
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Forms-Documents/Projects/LOWWP/Monarch-Grove/2-6-2018-Monarch-Grove-Hearing.aspx
Read about the plan and rationale for "capacity charges" for Monarch Grove. The charges named for them will have no impact on what charges the rest of hook-up-ees are paying.
Sewer geeks, aside from Monarch Grovians, might want to attend the April 3 meeting of the BOS!
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Poop Toys Hit The Market!
Well, hard to believe, but it is time for people older than babies to play with poop! Perhaps children will be the main customers, but I doubt it. Have a look:
https://www.hasbro.com/en-us/product/don-t-step-in-it:9988C0C6-451B-4FFA-8AE8-9C0DC66A32E9
https://nerditis.com/2017/12/22/life-in-plastic-toy-review-flush-force/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUmOPLhMFtU
I could not find the toys on some of the manufacturer's websites, so here is a nifty compilation:
https://www.thegameaisle.com/2018-toy-fair-trends-part-1-poop/
At least these things are not home-made......
https://www.hasbro.com/en-us/product/don-t-step-in-it:9988C0C6-451B-4FFA-8AE8-9C0DC66A32E9
https://nerditis.com/2017/12/22/life-in-plastic-toy-review-flush-force/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUmOPLhMFtU
I could not find the toys on some of the manufacturer's websites, so here is a nifty compilation:
https://www.thegameaisle.com/2018-toy-fair-trends-part-1-poop/
At least these things are not home-made......
Friday, February 23, 2018
Gibson's Plan To Lessen Sewer Settlement Shock
Los Osian Facebook users, see how Bruce Gibson will help us with the ARB lawsuit settlement costs:
https://www.facebook.com/bruce.gibson.1069/posts/1604269509665995
There was a lot of talk about how the County was culpable in screwing this up resulting in a $9.95 million settlement to ARB, but this really is just hogwash. ARB was sneaky and low-bid one part of the two collection system contracts offered. Then they lost the other bid. When the work for that bid they won started to overwhelm what they planned for, they started to lose money, so they did a bunch of sketchy change orders, trying to squeeze the County for more $$$.
The County had no choice but to accept ARB's bid and suspected that this was coming, but the law made them take it. (The other collection system bid was won by W.A. Rasic (remember the "WAR" logo on their equipment? No problems, on time, on budget.)
Gibson just posted tonight. He explained this plan this afternoon as his Los Osos Office Hours (February 22 - so I guess it is now yesterday afternoon.) He also outlined the plan again at the LOCAC meeting later, in the evening. He better get re-elected, or we might be screwed. No one else could possibly know the ins and outs of this sewer game is played to be able to figure out how to protect us from a backbreaking payback. Especially in negotiating with the state to try to lower our EPA loan down from 2%. Maybe the whole thing could be refinanced, saving us a bundle!
When he posts this information on his webpage, you might find it yourself before I post the link here (for non-Facebook users).
This was posted on Nextdoor today, which is from Bruce's Facebook page:
Bruce said: My position on the proposed settlement of the Los Osos sewer lawsuit: While I’m not happy about it, I will support paying the $9.95 million settlement from the county’s general fund reserves at our Board of Supervisors meeting on March 6. This is the final bill for constructing the sewer and it closes a long and contentious chapter in the history of Los Osos. Sewer rates will not be changed at the March 6 meeting. Assuming these funds are to be repaid to the general fund by sewer users, I will not support raising rates above the maximum levels approved by ratepayers in 2009. Any increase above the maximum levels would have to be approved by ratepayers. The details: Q: Where’s the money coming from to pay this settlement? Short answer: From the county’s general fund reserves. Long answer: On March 6, the action before the Board is to pay the settlement using funds from the county’s Solar Plant Mitigation Funds. These funds were collected in lieu of the sales tax that would have been paid if the solar panels and other construction materials for the big California Valley solar projects had been purchased in SLO County. They mitigate the sales tax loss (not the projects’ physical impacts) and currently total about $15 million. Q: How will this affect sewer rates? Short answer: The effect is yet to be determined. No change to sewer rates will be made on March 6. I will not support raising rates above the maximum already approved by ratepayers in 2009 in order to pay this settlement (see question below). Long answer: The effect on sewer rates depends on, a) the BOS as a whole requiring the sewer ratepayers to repay the reserve fund, which seems likely, and b) how the repayment is financed in terms of interest rate and length of loan. I am currently working with county staff and the State Water Resources Control Board on a refinancing proposal that might produce a minimal effect on rates. It will take several months to know whether this can be accomplished, but the SWRCB indicated at the time of the original loan that we could ask for a reduction in the interest rate below the current level of 2%. Another approach, among others, might be to structure the repayment as a loan from the county’s general fund. Q: What maximum rate increase could you support? Short answer: Any increase must be within the voter-approved rates. The maximum charge for a single family home could be raised by about $4.79/month under the currently approved rate structure. Long answer: In 2009, sewer users voted to approve a “rates and charges” ordinance under the provisions of Proposition 218. For a single family home, the rate is currently $44.06/month (fixed) plus $7.54/month per unit of water used indoors. A “unit” is 100 cubic feet or 748 gallons. The average home is charged about $157/month total – less than the $165/month we had originally estimated. The maximum fixed rate authorized in 2009 is $48.85/month or $4.79/month more than currently. The maximum average charge would then rise to about $162/month. Q: What if the BOS wants to raise rates higher? Short answer: The board would have to put any greater rate increase to a vote by the sewer ratepayers under the provisions of Prop 218. The ratepayers then decide. Longer answer: I won’t support even asking ratepayers for such an increase to pay this settlement. Q: Why did the county get sued? Short answer: A contractor on the sewer’s collection system, ARB Inc., submitted a low-ball bid to get the contract and then wanted more money for the work they were obligated to perform. Long answer: The sewer’s collection system (pipes in the streets) was so big that we split the contract into roughly equal halves. ARB was awarded the contract on one half, with a low bid of about $26 million – way under the next lowest bid of almost $35 million. This appeared to be a low-ball bid, but the county was obligated by state public contracting law to accept it. As work progressed, ARB claimed they were owed more money for the work they contracted to do because of conditions in the field that they claimed the county should have told them about. The strategy of increasing payments through unjustified change orders is not uncommon in public contracting. Q: So was the county at fault for this by being incompetent, inattentive or deceptive? Short answer: No. Long answer: The $26 million bid was clearly low when compared to the six competing bids, which ranged from approximately $35-$42 million. When ARB bid (unsuccessfully) on the other half of the collection system, their bid was $36 million. The county had stringent construction management procedures in place for both halves of the collection system. The contractor on the other half (W.A. Rasic, low bid of $29 million) made no unreasonable claims and completed their contract within budget. Q: Why is the county choosing to settle this lawsuit rather than fight it? Short answer: ARB claimed they were owed another $23 million. If this complex case went to trial, we would likely expend another $1.5 million in attorney and expert fees and risk an unsympathetic jury awarding them the $23 million they sought. We held our nose and agreed to a $9.95 million settlement to avoid that risk. Long answer: This case is extremely complex, involving the arcane details of construction practice and contract law. In four years of defending this litigation, we have already spent over $2.4 million on attorney and expert fees. The case was moved out of the SLO County courts and is being heard in Santa Maria, where juries are expected to be unsympathetic toward government.
https://www.facebook.com/bruce.gibson.1069/posts/1604269509665995
There was a lot of talk about how the County was culpable in screwing this up resulting in a $9.95 million settlement to ARB, but this really is just hogwash. ARB was sneaky and low-bid one part of the two collection system contracts offered. Then they lost the other bid. When the work for that bid they won started to overwhelm what they planned for, they started to lose money, so they did a bunch of sketchy change orders, trying to squeeze the County for more $$$.
The County had no choice but to accept ARB's bid and suspected that this was coming, but the law made them take it. (The other collection system bid was won by W.A. Rasic (remember the "WAR" logo on their equipment? No problems, on time, on budget.)
Gibson just posted tonight. He explained this plan this afternoon as his Los Osos Office Hours (February 22 - so I guess it is now yesterday afternoon.) He also outlined the plan again at the LOCAC meeting later, in the evening. He better get re-elected, or we might be screwed. No one else could possibly know the ins and outs of this sewer game is played to be able to figure out how to protect us from a backbreaking payback. Especially in negotiating with the state to try to lower our EPA loan down from 2%. Maybe the whole thing could be refinanced, saving us a bundle!
When he posts this information on his webpage, you might find it yourself before I post the link here (for non-Facebook users).
This was posted on Nextdoor today, which is from Bruce's Facebook page:
Bruce said: My position on the proposed settlement of the Los Osos sewer lawsuit: While I’m not happy about it, I will support paying the $9.95 million settlement from the county’s general fund reserves at our Board of Supervisors meeting on March 6. This is the final bill for constructing the sewer and it closes a long and contentious chapter in the history of Los Osos. Sewer rates will not be changed at the March 6 meeting. Assuming these funds are to be repaid to the general fund by sewer users, I will not support raising rates above the maximum levels approved by ratepayers in 2009. Any increase above the maximum levels would have to be approved by ratepayers. The details: Q: Where’s the money coming from to pay this settlement? Short answer: From the county’s general fund reserves. Long answer: On March 6, the action before the Board is to pay the settlement using funds from the county’s Solar Plant Mitigation Funds. These funds were collected in lieu of the sales tax that would have been paid if the solar panels and other construction materials for the big California Valley solar projects had been purchased in SLO County. They mitigate the sales tax loss (not the projects’ physical impacts) and currently total about $15 million. Q: How will this affect sewer rates? Short answer: The effect is yet to be determined. No change to sewer rates will be made on March 6. I will not support raising rates above the maximum already approved by ratepayers in 2009 in order to pay this settlement (see question below). Long answer: The effect on sewer rates depends on, a) the BOS as a whole requiring the sewer ratepayers to repay the reserve fund, which seems likely, and b) how the repayment is financed in terms of interest rate and length of loan. I am currently working with county staff and the State Water Resources Control Board on a refinancing proposal that might produce a minimal effect on rates. It will take several months to know whether this can be accomplished, but the SWRCB indicated at the time of the original loan that we could ask for a reduction in the interest rate below the current level of 2%. Another approach, among others, might be to structure the repayment as a loan from the county’s general fund. Q: What maximum rate increase could you support? Short answer: Any increase must be within the voter-approved rates. The maximum charge for a single family home could be raised by about $4.79/month under the currently approved rate structure. Long answer: In 2009, sewer users voted to approve a “rates and charges” ordinance under the provisions of Proposition 218. For a single family home, the rate is currently $44.06/month (fixed) plus $7.54/month per unit of water used indoors. A “unit” is 100 cubic feet or 748 gallons. The average home is charged about $157/month total – less than the $165/month we had originally estimated. The maximum fixed rate authorized in 2009 is $48.85/month or $4.79/month more than currently. The maximum average charge would then rise to about $162/month. Q: What if the BOS wants to raise rates higher? Short answer: The board would have to put any greater rate increase to a vote by the sewer ratepayers under the provisions of Prop 218. The ratepayers then decide. Longer answer: I won’t support even asking ratepayers for such an increase to pay this settlement. Q: Why did the county get sued? Short answer: A contractor on the sewer’s collection system, ARB Inc., submitted a low-ball bid to get the contract and then wanted more money for the work they were obligated to perform. Long answer: The sewer’s collection system (pipes in the streets) was so big that we split the contract into roughly equal halves. ARB was awarded the contract on one half, with a low bid of about $26 million – way under the next lowest bid of almost $35 million. This appeared to be a low-ball bid, but the county was obligated by state public contracting law to accept it. As work progressed, ARB claimed they were owed more money for the work they contracted to do because of conditions in the field that they claimed the county should have told them about. The strategy of increasing payments through unjustified change orders is not uncommon in public contracting. Q: So was the county at fault for this by being incompetent, inattentive or deceptive? Short answer: No. Long answer: The $26 million bid was clearly low when compared to the six competing bids, which ranged from approximately $35-$42 million. When ARB bid (unsuccessfully) on the other half of the collection system, their bid was $36 million. The county had stringent construction management procedures in place for both halves of the collection system. The contractor on the other half (W.A. Rasic, low bid of $29 million) made no unreasonable claims and completed their contract within budget. Q: Why is the county choosing to settle this lawsuit rather than fight it? Short answer: ARB claimed they were owed another $23 million. If this complex case went to trial, we would likely expend another $1.5 million in attorney and expert fees and risk an unsympathetic jury awarding them the $23 million they sought. We held our nose and agreed to a $9.95 million settlement to avoid that risk. Long answer: This case is extremely complex, involving the arcane details of construction practice and contract law. In four years of defending this litigation, we have already spent over $2.4 million on attorney and expert fees. The case was moved out of the SLO County courts and is being heard in Santa Maria, where juries are expected to be unsympathetic toward government.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
ARB Lawsuit Over At Last!
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article200135409.html
Well, it is finally over. And sad to say, it is cheaper to settle than to fight the thing. ARB didn't follow the rules. I guess they have paid their attorneys too during all of this time. So they, like we, are out that money. We did get a sizable discount anyway, which is also how these things usually go.
Here is the original article on the lawsuit:
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article200135409.html
Read the County staff report here:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/8402/SXRlbSBEb2N1bWVudCAoUHVibGljKSA=/14/n/90145.doc
Well, it is finally over. And sad to say, it is cheaper to settle than to fight the thing. ARB didn't follow the rules. I guess they have paid their attorneys too during all of this time. So they, like we, are out that money. We did get a sizable discount anyway, which is also how these things usually go.
Here is the original article on the lawsuit:
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article200135409.html
Read the County staff report here:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/8402/SXRlbSBEb2N1bWVudCAoUHVibGljKSA=/14/n/90145.doc
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Religious Beliefs V. Sewering Needs
I have a Google news alert for the word "sewer." I have used it for years to find interesting tidbits to post here when the news is slow in our little (but famous) corner of the sewer world. It is always amusing to find the postings for the word that are referencing a needle and thread or a sewing machine! Such is the oddball English language.
Anyway, I ran across an article that illuminated a unique reason for declining hooking up to a sewer. One would have thought with our deep and extensive decades-long sewer war that this might have come up here, but it did not.
Please do have a look and maybe you will find this story as fascinating and compelling as I did:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/pennsylvania_court_orders_amish_family_to_use_electric_sewer_pump
http://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/01/amish_electricity_court_ruling.html
Anyway, I ran across an article that illuminated a unique reason for declining hooking up to a sewer. One would have thought with our deep and extensive decades-long sewer war that this might have come up here, but it did not.
Please do have a look and maybe you will find this story as fascinating and compelling as I did:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/pennsylvania_court_orders_amish_family_to_use_electric_sewer_pump
http://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/01/amish_electricity_court_ruling.html
Saturday, January 13, 2018
Unconnected/No Excuse Properties Shrink To 68!
The latest Basin Management Committee meeting packet was released Friday evening (January 12) for the meeting to be held at the South Bay Community Center on Wednesday, January 17, 1:30 P.M.. Item 6, the Executive Director's Report, contained this interesting tidbit:
- As of 1/1/18, 95% of the lateral connections have been completed, an increase of 23 connections since last meeting.
- Of the 214 unconnected properties, 79 are waiting for the County/USDA/LOCSD low income grant program to pay for their connection leaving 135 properties that may require enforcement. Of the 135 properties, 46 are in the process of connecting (ie: obtained a building permit), and 21 have responded to the County’s survey giving reasons why they are not connected yet. Subtracting those categories leaves 68 properties (1.6% of 4200 total connections) that are the focus of the Code enforcement process.
You might want to see what else is in the packet, which you can find off of this link:
- The County had to cancel the Nov. 7 BOS meeting regarding enforcement. The County plans to go back to the Board with a County Code Amendment in a month or two. The intent is to strengthen our legal position regarding the enforcement process.
Wednesday, January 03, 2018
WOW! Russian BOTS In A Sewer Blog!
I know you are not real, but any attention to a tiny sewer blog written from a tiny town to have so many hits, is....well....BIZARRE!
What the HE-double-hockey-sticks are you doing sluicing around in American sewage? To what purpose? No one here is running for any office!
PS - You know I can see you, right?
Friday, December 29, 2017
Thursday, December 28, 2017
New Times Article - Sewer Discount 4 Low Income
This will be a bonus for some - read the New Times article off this link:
https://www.newtimesslo.com/sanluisobispo/county-opens-los-osos-sewer-service-discount-program/Content?oid=4010093
https://www.newtimesslo.com/sanluisobispo/county-opens-los-osos-sewer-service-discount-program/Content?oid=4010093
Sunday, December 17, 2017
Cuban Sewers
Where do I go when I want to find out some info quickly? Wikipedia!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Cuba#Wastewater_treatment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Cuba#Wastewater_treatment
Wastewater treatment
According to a 2006 report by the “Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba” to the US President, there are only five wastewater treatment plants in Cuba, and all of them are “inoperative”. They provide “some degree of treatment” to only four percent of collected wastewater, the remainder being discharged without treatment.
I was in Cuba recently, but only spent time in Havana or on a bus, (or in the Cienfuegos Bay, which is another story, although I did also visit the Bay of Pigs), so the manhole cover images I bring you below are all from Havana. Click the link to a map of Havana. I wish I could ID where each cover came from, but I can only generally say that they came from old town Havana. I did not know exactly where I was most of the time. Also, I did not see or smell anything untoward, so maybe it was the right season (no rain) or things have been upgraded:
The link directly below is a sewer disaster for your reading—well, not "pleasure," that's for sure. Hold your nose. I wasn't in Los Osos during the floods in 1995-96 where sewage emerged from the flooded underground and septic tanks popped up out of the ground, but this sounds baaaaaaddddd:
http://ens-newswire.com/2012/10/03/sewage-troubles-in-havana/
Perhaps it is understandable that the sewers are a bit balky, considering they were commissioned to be built around 1908 (actually built in 1915). Sources:
The Organic Municipal Law Of Cuba. You can get the free E-book off of this link: https://books.google.com/books?id=AoUVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=sewers+in+cuba&source=bl&ots=t7mRwIc6gI&sig=8BTfGgUVEvg2gR1tZ97pGVFMWsA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjfwLrBsbjXAhUE5GMKHcUVDlwQ6AEIYTAL#v=onepage&q=sewers%20in%20cuba&f=false
http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/cuba/pollution.htm
Here is an interesting article on recent sewage problems:
https://translatingcuba.com/the-sewer-waters-phantom-truck-gladys-linares-hemosoido/
Well, happy reading on all of that!
On the ground—literally—in Havana, are my manhole captures. I can't be certain they are all for sewers, but the ones labeled "alcantarilla" most likely are. (If you click on each image, you can enlarge it, BTW.)
http://ens-newswire.com/2012/10/03/sewage-troubles-in-havana/
Perhaps it is understandable that the sewers are a bit balky, considering they were commissioned to be built around 1908 (actually built in 1915). Sources:
The Organic Municipal Law Of Cuba. You can get the free E-book off of this link: https://books.google.com/books?id=AoUVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=sewers+in+cuba&source=bl&ots=t7mRwIc6gI&sig=8BTfGgUVEvg2gR1tZ97pGVFMWsA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjfwLrBsbjXAhUE5GMKHcUVDlwQ6AEIYTAL#v=onepage&q=sewers%20in%20cuba&f=false
http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/cuba/pollution.htm
Here is an interesting article on recent sewage problems:
https://translatingcuba.com/the-sewer-waters-phantom-truck-gladys-linares-hemosoido/
Well, happy reading on all of that!
On the ground—literally—in Havana, are my manhole captures. I can't be certain they are all for sewers, but the ones labeled "alcantarilla" most likely are. (If you click on each image, you can enlarge it, BTW.)
For the curious, I did take photos of things other than manhole covers, and I thought I might include a typical view from a street, but I guess I have maxed out my upload capabilities for a Blogspot post, I can't get anymore photos to upload.
Monday, December 11, 2017
Tame Sewer-Related YouTube Episodes
I was randomly watching TV tonight and happened upon the Mythbusters show. I thought I had recalled one of their programs from years past dealing with a sewer. What I found looking online to try to refresh my memory brought up the first two videos below.
But this is not at all what I remembered! Then I realized the show was called "Dirty Jobs" and found you have to pay Amazon to watch it. Oh well, watching the two parts to blasting manhole covers in the air for free is OK, and I did find the cool videos of unclogging sewer lines in: Denton, Texas; Edina, Minnesota; Los Angeles, California.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DokeJj0pxPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JrCYYLHQPY
Denton, Texas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xdoqcSOixs
Edina, Minnesota.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyYd8T5jy4
Los Angeles, California.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fewPbl0k9VA
But this is not at all what I remembered! Then I realized the show was called "Dirty Jobs" and found you have to pay Amazon to watch it. Oh well, watching the two parts to blasting manhole covers in the air for free is OK, and I did find the cool videos of unclogging sewer lines in: Denton, Texas; Edina, Minnesota; Los Angeles, California.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DokeJj0pxPw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JrCYYLHQPY
Denton, Texas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xdoqcSOixs
Edina, Minnesota.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUyYd8T5jy4
Los Angeles, California.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fewPbl0k9VA
Wednesday, December 06, 2017
New Funds For Hook-Ups Up Hinge On Checkbook
UPDATE! Great news! The LOCSD passed the resolution tonight - those in need will get their lateral money. I don't know how long it takes to set up the account though, and real contractor bids will be needed by the applicants, so call the District office 805 528-9370 for more information. Penalties for not hooking up are apparently around the corner, so this really is here in the nick of time! There is around $139,000 left, so if you want to be part of figuring out ways to help people out with the rest of it, attend the Finance Committee meetings. Info for date and time will be posted on the LOCSD website.)
There were funds gathered years ago by friends of low-income folks to be administered by the LOCSD to help with the sewer costs for the plant that was to be built back in the early 2000s (and delayed numerous times by lawsuits). That sewer project was stopped in 2005 and in the fallout from that, these funds went into a back burner Community Foundation savings account. This money was safe from being raided by the board that bankrupted the LOCSD. This money was sort of left to languish until the LOCSD posted this on their website:
The link to the live page is here (I am reposting this from an earlier post).
Now these funds are in another position. They need an OK from the LOCSD board to acquire a bank account and checkbook to disburse them. As with anything in Los Osos sewer-land, I do not feel comfortable that there is only one side to this apparent no-brainer. Take a look at the agenda item about this from the meeting that will take place tomorrow - Thursday night:, 7:00 p.m. at the District Office (some history is included there):
https://www.losososcsd.org/files/99c2e8b69/Agenda+Item+12A+Adopt+Resolution+Establishing+Bank+Account+for+Low+Income+Assistance+Funds+and+Approve+Applications.pdf
I hope that those of you interested in helping out the remaining people who need assistance with the hook-ups will show up tomorrow night at the LOCSD meeting and will say so when public comment times comes for this item. Supporting keeping the money here in Los Osos, with our far cheaper way to disburse this money as opposed to the County doing it, is important. If you can't show up, please write a letter of support to the board to do so.
Contact the board at this address: board@losososcsd.org
There were funds gathered years ago by friends of low-income folks to be administered by the LOCSD to help with the sewer costs for the plant that was to be built back in the early 2000s (and delayed numerous times by lawsuits). That sewer project was stopped in 2005 and in the fallout from that, these funds went into a back burner Community Foundation savings account. This money was safe from being raided by the board that bankrupted the LOCSD. This money was sort of left to languish until the LOCSD posted this on their website:
Now these funds are in another position. They need an OK from the LOCSD board to acquire a bank account and checkbook to disburse them. As with anything in Los Osos sewer-land, I do not feel comfortable that there is only one side to this apparent no-brainer. Take a look at the agenda item about this from the meeting that will take place tomorrow - Thursday night:, 7:00 p.m. at the District Office (some history is included there):
https://www.losososcsd.org/files/99c2e8b69/Agenda+Item+12A+Adopt+Resolution+Establishing+Bank+Account+for+Low+Income+Assistance+Funds+and+Approve+Applications.pdf
I hope that those of you interested in helping out the remaining people who need assistance with the hook-ups will show up tomorrow night at the LOCSD meeting and will say so when public comment times comes for this item. Supporting keeping the money here in Los Osos, with our far cheaper way to disburse this money as opposed to the County doing it, is important. If you can't show up, please write a letter of support to the board to do so.
Contact the board at this address: board@losososcsd.org
Saturday, November 18, 2017
From A Once Sewer Problem Spot - The Key West Sewer!
Yes, little, tiny 1 mile by 4 mile Key West has a sewer! And has had one a lot sooner than that certain central coast town that was referred to in this blog's name. But that sewer was not without its own horrid fight.
The article linked below says it all, and we might appreciate the scope and cost of their $1 billion sewer project. FYI, in 1889 Key West was the largest and wealthiest city in Florida (unlike Los Osos in California, which has not hit that mark and likely never will):
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/article1980193.html
Here is the official link to their current sewer page:
http://www.cityofkeywest-fl.gov/department/division.php?structureid=164
Happy expansion of your sewer education!
Saturday, November 11, 2017
Hook-Up Enforcement Withdrawn!
The numbers have shrunk as to how many households are yet to hook up to our sewer. A huge delay was the sluggishness of getting the funding for those who qualified. They have been waiting patiently. There was actually supposed to be a Board of Supervisor's meeting about this on November 14, which is why I was looking tonight to see the agenda and support documents. But alas, I missed it by a week, it was to have been on the agenda November 7, and then, at the last minute it was pulled. You can see it in the original removal off of this link:
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/934/QWdlbmRh/6/n/86079.doc
But I can show you a photo here below. If will try to be more on top of this. The sewage story around here is so quiet, I forget about it sometimes.......
http://agenda.slocounty.ca.gov/agenda/sanluisobispo/934/QWdlbmRh/6/n/86079.doc
But I can show you a photo here below. If will try to be more on top of this. The sewage story around here is so quiet, I forget about it sometimes.......
(You can click on the image to see it larger.)
Wednesday, November 08, 2017
Decorate Your Bathroom For The Holidays!
And while you are doing that, you are helping to fund toilets for those lacking them!
See the video here:
http://www.whogivesacrap.org/indiegogo/
See what this is about here:
https://us.whogivesacrap.org/pages/about-us
And shop here:
https://us.whogivesacrap.org/
See the video here:
http://www.whogivesacrap.org/indiegogo/
See what this is about here:
https://us.whogivesacrap.org/pages/about-us
And shop here:
https://us.whogivesacrap.org/
Friday, November 03, 2017
Community Funds Available For Sewer Hook-ups!
I attended the Los Osos CSD meeting tonight. General Manager Renee Osborn reported that there were funds from the Community Fund Low Income Assistance Program to help the approximately 245 residents that had not hooked up to do so (unless some in that number are making a political statement by not hooking upon course....).
Access the webpage that explains what this is with a link to the application:
https://www.losososcsd.org/los-osos-community-funds-now-available-for-low-income-residents
To read a bit more about it, read Ms. Osborn's report:
https://www.losososcsd.org/files/1f78e318a/Agenda+Item+9D+GM+Report+for+October+2017.pdf
More information will be forthcoming from the County and other agencies.
Access the webpage that explains what this is with a link to the application:
https://www.losososcsd.org/los-osos-community-funds-now-available-for-low-income-residents
To read a bit more about it, read Ms. Osborn's report:
https://www.losososcsd.org/files/1f78e318a/Agenda+Item+9D+GM+Report+for+October+2017.pdf
More information will be forthcoming from the County and other agencies.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
New County Webpage With Comprehensive Sewer Info!
I got an Email tonight with news from around the county, and on that page was a link to the County's new Los Osos sewer web page.
This new LO sewer page has a TON of sewer tax info and there are a plethora of links to click find out all about your tax bill, what's on it, and how is it calculated, and MUCH more. So have a look and happy exploring. Even if the topic is taxes...you's rather know how stuff got there, right?
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Department-News/Los-Osos-Tax-Bills-Now-Include-Wastewater-Costs.aspx
This new LO sewer page has a TON of sewer tax info and there are a plethora of links to click find out all about your tax bill, what's on it, and how is it calculated, and MUCH more. So have a look and happy exploring. Even if the topic is taxes...you's rather know how stuff got there, right?
http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Department-News/Los-Osos-Tax-Bills-Now-Include-Wastewater-Costs.aspx
Squatty Potty's Latest
I was scrolling through Facebook this AM and found in the ads on my feed—the latest offering from Squatty Potty! https://www.squattypotty.com Yeah, I also got ads for hair dye and a cat shadow illusion lamp. Clearly FB knows who I am. I did what I have never done before, I clicked on the SP link, but that is OK for a person with a sewer blog, I think.
Imagine how fun it must have been to work on this ad! Especially for the actor chomping down on the dragon poop! Be sure to visit the Fan Photos page! I have not personally used one of these things, I just appreciate their ads and completely understand why they do their advertising on FB and YouTube.
Imagine how fun it must have been to work on this ad! Especially for the actor chomping down on the dragon poop! Be sure to visit the Fan Photos page! I have not personally used one of these things, I just appreciate their ads and completely understand why they do their advertising on FB and YouTube.
Monday, October 23, 2017
Fatberg Video!
To follow-up on a former post, here is a "Fatberg" video (see link below). It purports to show its removal.....well, I didn't see that, but it is fun to see the actual entity, which is far more photogenic than other Fatbergs I have seen (online, alas, not in person).
Here is the Baltimore video (look at the bottom):
https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/watch-20-foot-fatberg-removed-from-baltimore-sewer-1764957
While you are at it - check out a London Fatberg:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH7IwiHFVMs
Baltimore looks better in my opinion.
Here is the Baltimore video (look at the bottom):
https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/watch-20-foot-fatberg-removed-from-baltimore-sewer-1764957
While you are at it - check out a London Fatberg:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH7IwiHFVMs
Baltimore looks better in my opinion.
Sunday, October 15, 2017
Septic Tank "Basement"
An interesting story turned up while on the Open Studios Tour yesterday. You know how it is, you are looking at art, sculpture, jewelry, and the topic of the sewer comes up. You could be at the grocery store or at Sweet Springs and the topic of the sewer comes up. Not always of course, but what other town besides one beset with sewer woes for lo, these 40 years, and paying through the nose for those delays, and the topic of the full-on sewer tax hitting us now that everything is in, would the sewer topic have come up?
Well, I guess these days, Morro Bay.......... But it is not quite the same comparison, as they have had a sewer for many, many, many years. In contrast, we are in the almost finished process of saying goodbye to our septic tanks, except for those areas in town where they are not forbidden.
The (presumed) owners of one house either: Thought there would never be a sewer; they loved their septic tank so much they didn't want to part with it, so hid it; OR, did not know where it was when they built their living room on top of it. Or maybe they did not care, or thought they could just not bother with a permit? (Our personal wild-wild-west example: We found a whole room built inside of the garage when we bought the house - drywall and everything.)
So....when it was time to hook up, in order to pump the tank, they had to cut a hole in the living room floor. Maybe I am a clean freak, but the thought of the pulsing, stinky, waste evacuation hose snaking over ruined carpet, or maybe shattered tile, or ecologically friendly splintered bamboo flooring seemed kind of gross! I don't know what the requirements were to fill in the tank, cement or gravel, but for sure, it would not be re-used for rainwater catchment!
Well, I guess these days, Morro Bay.......... But it is not quite the same comparison, as they have had a sewer for many, many, many years. In contrast, we are in the almost finished process of saying goodbye to our septic tanks, except for those areas in town where they are not forbidden.
The (presumed) owners of one house either: Thought there would never be a sewer; they loved their septic tank so much they didn't want to part with it, so hid it; OR, did not know where it was when they built their living room on top of it. Or maybe they did not care, or thought they could just not bother with a permit? (Our personal wild-wild-west example: We found a whole room built inside of the garage when we bought the house - drywall and everything.)
So....when it was time to hook up, in order to pump the tank, they had to cut a hole in the living room floor. Maybe I am a clean freak, but the thought of the pulsing, stinky, waste evacuation hose snaking over ruined carpet, or maybe shattered tile, or ecologically friendly splintered bamboo flooring seemed kind of gross! I don't know what the requirements were to fill in the tank, cement or gravel, but for sure, it would not be re-used for rainwater catchment!
Saturday, October 07, 2017
Fatbergs!
Well, it has been a while since I have posted anything on fatbergs, so it is time to get caught up. I found two articles recently in the New York Times.
Happy reading, just don't be eating breakfast or something whilst reading these; the description in the lower article describes a fatberg as having "...a smell that mixes rotting meat and smelly toilet."
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/09/26/us/ap-us-baltimore-fatberg.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/world/europe/uk-london-fatberg.html
Happy reading, just don't be eating breakfast or something whilst reading these; the description in the lower article describes a fatberg as having "...a smell that mixes rotting meat and smelly toilet."
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/09/26/us/ap-us-baltimore-fatberg.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/world/europe/uk-london-fatberg.html
(The lower link comes with a lovely color photo! The photo is from 2014 when another fat berg struck London. The current fatberg is called the "Whitechapel fatberg," and it is estimated to weigh 140 tons.)
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Paean To Sewers!
I just now ran across this fun tribute to sewers and what they mean to us - have a read:
https://www.indivisible.us/i-love-my-sewer/
(Wish I had written it!)
https://www.indivisible.us/i-love-my-sewer/
(Wish I had written it!)
Sunday, September 24, 2017
Latest News From Our Sewer Laterals!
I attended the Basin Management Committee meeting on Wednesday, September 20. Mark Hutchinson, Deputy Director of the Resources Group in the county's Public Work's Department, filled in for Bruce Gibson on the committee, and gave a report on how our sewer lateral connections are going. Very well, as it turns out! 282 are all that are left to connect, and of that, about 85 are on a low income program that has not yet worked its way all the way through the federal agency that is funding them. So less than 200 are left to hook up! How to address this issue of the mystery non-hook-ups will be before the Board of Supes in the second week of November. That will be a meeting worth watching. I plan to tune in!
Saturday, September 16, 2017
200+ Year Old Sewer Plant!
Have a look! https://www.dcwater.com/wastewater-collection-history
Check out the size of this thing! https://www.dcwater.com/projects
Awesome nitrogen removal via a new technique, the DEMON® process! https://www.dcwater.com/projects/filtrate-treatment-facilities
Combined sewage used to flow into the waterways during heavy rainstorms (as opposed to ours sinking into the ground atop our drinking water!) https://www.dcwater.com/projects/tunnel-dewatering-pump-station-and-enhanced-clarification-facility
Have a look at their gorgeous annual report! https://www.dcwater.com/sites/default/files/2016annual_1.24.17_lo.pdf
The scope of this thing is just amazing!! I am super happy at finding this website through a random tweet!
Check out the size of this thing! https://www.dcwater.com/projects
Awesome nitrogen removal via a new technique, the DEMON® process! https://www.dcwater.com/projects/filtrate-treatment-facilities
Combined sewage used to flow into the waterways during heavy rainstorms (as opposed to ours sinking into the ground atop our drinking water!) https://www.dcwater.com/projects/tunnel-dewatering-pump-station-and-enhanced-clarification-facility
Have a look at their gorgeous annual report! https://www.dcwater.com/sites/default/files/2016annual_1.24.17_lo.pdf
The scope of this thing is just amazing!! I am super happy at finding this website through a random tweet!
Saturday, September 09, 2017
Manhole Cover Marketing
Some enterprising Los Osian could follow the idea from the street artist collective in Berlin, named Raubdruckerin (translation: pirate printer). They are printing sewer covers (and other public metal fixtures) onto organic cotton T-shirts, using eco-friendly paint. if you wanted to buy one or some, they have been a little bit too successful; they are almost sold out as of this writing. More on the way however!
http://mentalfloss.com/article/84044/berlin-artists-create-graphic-designs-public-street-fixtures
https://craftingagreenworld.com/2016/08/01/raubdruckerin-prints-t-shirts-from-manhole-covers/
https://raubdruckerin.de/t-shirts
Seriously, this could mean money in someone's enterprising pocketbook. Plus an affirmation of our sewer reputation which like it or not, has not vanished into the poop pail of history, and maybe it shouldn't; you know the aphorism about "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it".....However, if anyone tries this, please do not get squashed by a passing motorist!
http://mentalfloss.com/article/84044/berlin-artists-create-graphic-designs-public-street-fixtures
https://craftingagreenworld.com/2016/08/01/raubdruckerin-prints-t-shirts-from-manhole-covers/
https://raubdruckerin.de/t-shirts
Seriously, this could mean money in someone's enterprising pocketbook. Plus an affirmation of our sewer reputation which like it or not, has not vanished into the poop pail of history, and maybe it shouldn't; you know the aphorism about "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it".....However, if anyone tries this, please do not get squashed by a passing motorist!
Tuesday, September 05, 2017
Poop In Paso
The Tribune has posted a report about a private sewer line in Paso Robles that popped. Poop poured into the street and down into a storm drain. Enquiring minds want to know what caused the failure!
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article171245587.html
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article171245587.html
Monday, September 04, 2017
Nighttime, When Nature Calls While Camping
My teenage camping experiences, actually, my only camping experiences, involved backpacking in the Sierras. Once we even had the benefit of a burro to carry stuff. Tents - who needed those (!) - we had sleeping bags on a tarp, on top of some piney duff where we could find it! The bathroom was anyplace away from water sources and the trails, and required a small spade and a (by then, semi-squashed) roll of toilet paper.
Flash forward to 2017. I have not re-camped anyplace since those days. If I did, I would stay in a campground with a camper of some sort or type (I am just not up to sleeping on the ground at a place that took hours of an uphill climb to find anymore.) The stumbling block to even the campground however, has been where to potty in the middle of the night. Whaaat, I can hear you saying?
Imagine that you had a couple of beers around the campfire (if you had built one of those if it was even allowed, and marshmallows having been left behind as a far younger age-appropriate treat). Or how about a couple of beers (or a Martini?) at the rustic wooden picnic table where you are eating your pop-up food, expanded from tiny chunks in a foil package, add water and heat. You get sleepy and crawl into your sleeping bag in your camper. Two hours later, your bladder registers full. Really full. And you know you have to stumble a block or more to the potties. In the dark. Wild things rustling around (in black and white outfits perhaps, or with teeth in any color fur ensemble). You will never get back to sleep upon return from that fear-fraught trek. The solution to this uncomfortable scenario is pictured below. A portable potty or to be fancy, pinky raised in the air, a Toilette Portative, with it's own little tent..........
.........with two zippered flaps for escaping fumes, one on top, and one in the back.
And the whole thing folds up into the little round bag! Impressionnant!!!!
Flash forward to 2017. I have not re-camped anyplace since those days. If I did, I would stay in a campground with a camper of some sort or type (I am just not up to sleeping on the ground at a place that took hours of an uphill climb to find anymore.) The stumbling block to even the campground however, has been where to potty in the middle of the night. Whaaat, I can hear you saying?
Imagine that you had a couple of beers around the campfire (if you had built one of those if it was even allowed, and marshmallows having been left behind as a far younger age-appropriate treat). Or how about a couple of beers (or a Martini?) at the rustic wooden picnic table where you are eating your pop-up food, expanded from tiny chunks in a foil package, add water and heat. You get sleepy and crawl into your sleeping bag in your camper. Two hours later, your bladder registers full. Really full. And you know you have to stumble a block or more to the potties. In the dark. Wild things rustling around (in black and white outfits perhaps, or with teeth in any color fur ensemble). You will never get back to sleep upon return from that fear-fraught trek. The solution to this uncomfortable scenario is pictured below. A portable potty or to be fancy, pinky raised in the air, a Toilette Portative, with it's own little tent..........
.........with two zippered flaps for escaping fumes, one on top, and one in the back.
Friday, July 21, 2017
He's Baaaaaack!! Tom Murphy Of Wrecklamator Fame!!
Normally, I would not send anyone over to CalCoastNews as they are an outfit that reports fake news and promotes extreme right-wing and Tea Party viewpoints (except for the few bare bones stories that they lift from other news sources that report fires, accidents, and such). They have harmed friends of mine with their lies and very one-sided reporting, over and over— for years.
However, this time, the guy that the Water Board warned us against (see below) is back, Dee Thomas Murphy, the Reclamator scam guy!
However, this time, the guy that the Water Board warned us against (see below) is back, Dee Thomas Murphy, the Reclamator scam guy!
(Click the image to view a larger size.)
Now, take a look at the comment - wait!! The comment disappeared!! In the time it took me to write this and to go back to CCN to get you the link, the comment vanished from the CalCoastNews story! Maybe they have more sense than I thought, or perhaps they just followed their own guidelines which do not allow for long legal screeds, which is what Tom posted.
Well, it is horrifying to know that Dee Thomas Murphy is still lurking locally in the background, and is STILL trying to scam Los Osos citizens into funding his bogus schemes. Since I captured the page as a pdf, I can give you a quote from Tom's post on CalCoastNews today (Tom now posting as "NSEA International"):
Do NOT fall for this scam if it appears elsewhere!
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Tribune Reports On Delinquent Sewer Service Charges!
Have a look; and as of 10:57 a.m.Wednesday, July19, 2017, there were no comments in the common section.
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article162293868.html
And, in an earlier article, the Tribune explains why:
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article147477314.html
(On this article, the comments appear oddly truncated.)
There is another Tribune article on this topic, too. Get a cup of coffee (or tea or kombucha) and read them all!
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article148522254.html
A quote from this last article;
http://slocounty.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=2665
Look for items 18 and especially 19.
Read more here: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article148522254.html#storylink=cpy
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article162293868.html
And, in an earlier article, the Tribune explains why:
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article147477314.html
(On this article, the comments appear oddly truncated.)
There is another Tribune article on this topic, too. Get a cup of coffee (or tea or kombucha) and read them all!
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article148522254.html
A quote from this last article;
"State fines are likely far down the road. It’s an administrative process that involves quite a few steps, including a notice of violation and then a complaint. And property owners could contest the penalty.
"'In the future, it may be necessary for the water board to exercise its enforcement authority,' Packard said. 'The water board has demonstrated that it is willing to use that authority.'
"County fines for violating county municipal codes start at $100 a day and whether the accused does not respond or takes no action within the month, the fine bumps up to $500 a day."The meeting where all of this happened can be viewed here:
http://slocounty.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=2665
Look for items 18 and especially 19.
Read more here: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article148522254.html#storylink=cpy
Saturday, July 01, 2017
July 18 Sewer Service Charge Supes Hearing
This came in the mail days and days ago and I managed to scan it, but not post it.
Sorry about the underlining (husband with a pen damage),
and yes, I was too lazy to Photoshop it out.
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Sewer Delinquents Mark Your Calendars! Plus Rebates!
I have been a tardy blogger of late, but am back in time to warn tardy payers they could be caught forking over delinquent service charges. Please read!
Items: Set for Hearing:
-
Setting of a public hearing to consider collecting of sewer service charges onproperty tax bills for San Luis Obispo County Wastewater Assessment DistrictNo. 1, Los Osos. Hearing date set for July 18, 2017. District 2.
-
Setting of a public hearing to consider collecting delinquent service charges onthe 2017-18 County property tax bills for San Luis Obispo County WastewaterAssessment District No. 1, Los Osos. Hearing date set for July 18, 2017. District 2.
Consent Agenda - Public Works Items:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











